Picture 1 of 1

Stock photo

Professors Behaving Badly: Faculty Misconduct in Graduate Education by Braxton - Picture 1 of 1

Professors Behaving Badly : Faculty Misconduct in Graduate Education by John M. Braxton, Alan E. Bayer and Eve M. Proper (2011, Hardcover)

AlibrisBooks (460044)

98.6% positive Feedback

Price:

US $63.43

Approximately£47.28

+ $15.40 postage

Estimated delivery Fri, 1 Aug - Tue, 12 Aug

Returns:

30 days return. Buyer pays for return postage. If you use an eBay delivery label, it will be deducted from your refund amount.

Condition:

New

New Hard cover

About this product

Product Identifiers

PublisherJohns Hopkins University Press

ISBN-10142140219X

ISBN-139781421402192

eBay Product ID (ePID)4038820207

Product Key Features

Number of Pages240 Pages

LanguageEnglish

Publication NameProfessors Behaving Badly : Faculty Misconduct in Graduate Education

SubjectBusiness Ethics, Sociology / General, Higher, Teaching Methods & Materials / General

Publication Year2011

TypeTextbook

AuthorJohn M. Braxton, Alan E. Bayer, Eve M. Proper

Subject AreaSocial Science, Education, Business & Economics

FormatHardcover

Dimensions

Item Height0.8 in

Item Weight16 Oz

Item Length9 in

Item Width6 in

Additional Product Features

Intended AudienceScholarly & Professional

LCCN2011-008669

ReviewsTools for monitoring and evaluating the behavior of graduate teachers are also provided, in this practical, serious-minded reference and resource that no campus administrator or supervisor should be without., ""Tools for monitoring and evaluating the behavior of graduate teachers are also provided, in this practical, serious-minded reference and resource that no campus administrator or supervisor should be without.""

Dewey Edition22

Grade FromCollege Graduate Student

Dewey Decimal378.1/250973

Table Of ContentList of Tables Acknowledgments Introduction: The Critical Role of Norms in Graduate Education 1. Incidents of Faculty Improprieties in Graduate Training 2. Study Design 3. The Normative Structure of Graduate Education 4. Norm Espousal by Institutional Type and Academic Discipline 5. Personal Attributes and Norm Espousal 6. Norm Espousal and Faculty Professional Attainments and Involvement 7. Core Norms, Differentiated Norms, and Key Differentiating Factors 8. Graduate School Socialization and the Internalization of the Norms of Graduate Study 9. The Support of Graduate Teaching Norms by Supporting Organizations 10. Further Perspectives on the Internalization of the Norms of Graduate Teaching and Mentoring 11. Conclusions and Recommendations for Research, Policy, and Practice Appendix A: The Graduate Teaching and Mentoring Behaviors Inventory Appendix B: Means and Standard Deviations for Behaviors Included in the Graduate Teaching and Mentoring Behaviors Inventory (GTMBI) Appendix C: Respondent Bias Assessment References Index

SynopsisA faculty member publishes an article without offering coauthorship to a graduate assistant who has made a substantial conceptual or methodological contribution to the article. A faculty member does not permit graduate students to express viewpoints different from her own. A graduate student close to finishing his dissertation cannot reach his traveling advisor, a circumstance that jeopardizes his degree. These and other examples of faculty misconduct -- and how to avoid them -- are the subject of this book.A companion to Faculty Misconduct in Collegiate Teaching, this volume focuses on graduate teaching and mentoring. From data collected through faculty surveys, the authors describe behaviors associated with graduate teaching considered inappropriate and in violation of good teaching practices. They then derive a normative structure that consists of five inviolable (warranting severe punishment) and eight admonitory (reprovable, but less severe) proscriptive norms to help graduate faculty make informed and acceptable professional choices. The authors discuss the various ways in which faculty members acquire the norms of teaching and mentoring, including the graduate school socialization process, role models, disciplinary codes of ethics, and scholarship about the professoriate and professional performance. They also analyze the rich data gleaned from the faculty surveys and track how these norms are understood and interpreted across academic disciplines and influenced by such factors as gender, citizenship, age, academic rank, tenure, research activity, and administrative experience. Professors Behaving Badly outlines institutional and disciplinary conditions that define normative behavior and recommends best practices to discourage future faculty misconduct. Praise for Faculty Misconduct in Collegiate Teaching'An important book that plows through long-neglected territory.' -- University Business'Thoughtfully conceived, carefully executed, well written, cautiously interpreted.' -- Contemporary Sociology'The authors posit nine types of conduct that they view as examples of misconduct and seven inviolable norms that they find in existence in the broad field of instructional service... A serious and useful study of a new field.' -- Change, - A faculty member publishes an article without offering coauthorship to a graduate assistant who has made a substantial conceptual or methodological contribution to the article. - A professor does not permit graduate students to express viewpoints different from her own. - A graduate student close to finishing his dissertation cannot reach his traveling advisor, a circumstance that jeopardizes his degree. This book discusses these and other examples of faculty misconduct--and how to avoid them. Using data collected through faculty surveys, the authors describe behaviors associated with graduate teaching which are considered inappropriate and in violation of good teaching practices. They derive a normative structure that consists of five inviolable and eight admonitory proscriptive criteria to help graduate faculty make informed and acceptable professional choices. The authors discuss the various ways in which faculty members acquire the norms of teaching and mentoring, including the graduate school socialization process, role models, disciplinary codes of ethics, and scholarship about the professoriate and professional performance. Analyzing the rich data gleaned from the faculty surveys, they track how these norms are understood and interpreted across academic disciplines and are influenced by such factors as gender, citizenship, age, academic rank, tenure, research activity, and administrative experience., A faculty member publishes an article without offering coauthorship to a graduate assistant who has made a substantial conceptual or methodological contribution to the article. A faculty member does not permit graduate students to express viewpoints different from her own. A graduate student close to finishing his dissertation cannot reach his ......, * A faculty member publishes an article without offering coauthorship to a graduate assistant who has made a substantial conceptual or methodological contribution to the article. * A professor does not permit graduate students to express viewpoints different from her own. * A graduate student close to finishing his dissertation cannot reach his traveling advisor, a circumstance that jeopardizes his degree. This book discusses these and other examples of faculty misconduct--and how to avoid them. Using data collected through faculty surveys, the authors describe behaviors associated with graduate teaching which are considered inappropriate and in violation of good teaching practices. They derive a normative structure that consists of five inviolable and eight admonitory proscriptive criteria to help graduate faculty make informed and acceptable professional choices. The authors discuss the various ways in which faculty members acquire the norms of teaching and mentoring, including the graduate school socialization process, role models, disciplinary codes of ethics, and scholarship about the professoriate and professional performance. Analyzing the rich data gleaned from the faculty surveys, they track how these norms are understood and interpreted across academic disciplines and are influenced by such factors as gender, citizenship, age, academic rank, tenure, research activity, and administrative experience.

LC Classification NumberLB1779.B74 2011