|Listed in category:
This item is out of stock.
Have one to sell?

Cinefex Magazine Lot of 5 issues #71, 72, 74, 75, 79

Amazing Finds and Collectibles
  • (10855)
  • Registered as a business seller
US $19.95
Approximately£15.64
Condition:
Very Good
Postage:
US $5.61 (approx £4.40) Economy Delivery. See detailsfor postage
Located in: Westland, Michigan, United States
Delivery:
Estimated between Sat, 8 Jun and Mon, 10 Jun to 43230
Delivery time is estimated using our proprietary method which is based on the buyer's proximity to the item location, the delivery service selected, the seller's delivery history and other factors. Delivery times may vary, especially during peak periods.
Returns:
30 days return. Seller pays for return postage. See details- for more information about returns
Payments:
     

Shop with confidence

eBay Money Back Guarantee
Get the item you ordered or your money back. Learn moreeBay Money Back Guarantee - opens new window or tab
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:315298499886

Item specifics

Condition
Very Good: A book that has been read and does not look new, but is in excellent condition. No ...
Language
English
Publication Name
cinefex
Genre
Technology
Topic
War

Item description from the seller

Amazing Finds and Collectibles

Amazing Finds and Collectibles

99.6% positive Feedback
27K items sold
Joined Feb 1999

Detailed seller ratings

Average for the last 12 months

Accurate description
5.0
Reasonable postage cost
4.9
Delivery time
5.0
Communication
5.0
Registered as a business seller

Seller Feedback (11,192)

r***r (251)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past 6 months
Verified purchase
Shipping was timely. Packaging could have been better with some cardboard or heavy card-stock to add some rigidity. Also while at a very good price the magazines definitely had more wear and damage than the “very good” quality description details with lots of damage to the spines, dog ear creases to every covers corner, and a few heavily worn edges. Again a relatively fair price but would have used a lower quality descriptor
See all Feedback