Picture 1 of 1

Gallery
Picture 1 of 1

Have one to sell?
The Popper-Carnap Controversy
US $18.66
Approximately£13.91
Condition:
Good
A book that has been read, but is in good condition. Minimal damage to the book cover eg. scuff marks, but no holes or tears. If this is a hard cover, the dust jacket may be missing. Binding has minimal wear. The majority of pages are undamaged with some creasing or tearing, and pencil underlining of text, but this is minimal. No highlighting of text, no writing in the margins, and no missing pages. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.
Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.
Refresh your browser window to try again.
Postage:
Free Standard Shipping.
Located in: Grand Rapids, MI, United States
Delivery:
Estimated between Wed, 23 Jul and Fri, 25 Jul to 94104
Returns:
30 days return. Seller pays for return postage.
Payments:
Shop with confidence
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:388014159771
Item specifics
- Condition
- Artist
- Michalos, Alex C.
- Book Title
- The Popper-Carnap Controversy
- ISBN
- 9789024751273
About this product
Product Identifiers
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
ISBN-10
9024751276
ISBN-13
9789024751273
eBay Product ID (ePID)
662659
Product Key Features
Number of Pages
Xi, 124 Pages
Publication Name
Popper-Carnap Controversy
Language
English
Publication Year
1971
Subject
Philosophy & Social Aspects, Individual Philosophers, General
Type
Textbook
Subject Area
Philosophy, Science
Format
Trade Paperback
Dimensions
Item Weight
16.2 Oz
Item Length
9.4 in
Item Width
6.3 in
Additional Product Features
Intended Audience
Scholarly & Professional
LCCN
70-873619
Number of Volumes
1 vol.
Illustrated
Yes
Table Of Content
I: Introduction.- II: Acceptability and Logical Improbability.- III: Two Explicanda and Three Arguments.- IV: Bar-Hillel's "Comments" and Unrestricted Universals.- V: Instance and Qualified-Instance Confirmation.- VI: The Singular Predictive Inference.- VII: Lakatos on Appraisal, Growth and Analytic Guides.- VIII: Hintikka and Hilpinen on Inductive Generalzation.- IX: Cost-Benefit Versus Expected Utility Acceptance Rules.- List of Reference.
Synopsis
1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keynes, H. Reichen- bach and R. Carnap. 2 It was Popper's intention then, to expose the error and to introduce an explicatum for the prescientific concept of degree of confirmation. A few months later Y. Bar-Hillel published an article attempting to show that no serious error had been committed (particularly by Carnap) and that the problem introduced by Popper was simply a "verbal one. "3 Popper replied immediately that "Dr. Bar-Hillel forces me Popper] now to criticize Carnap's theory further," and he Popper] introduced further objections which, if accepted, destroy Carnap's theory. 4 About eight years after this exchange took place I was in graduate school at the University of Chicago in search of a topic for a doctoral dissertation. An investigation of the issues involved in this exchange seemed to be ideal for me because I had (and still have) a great ad- miration for the work of both Carnap and Popper. A thoroughly revised and I hope improved account of that investigation appears in the first five chapters of this book. Put very briefly, what I found were four main points of contention., 1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keynes, H. Reichen bach and R. Carnap. 2 It was Popper's intention then, to expose the error and to introduce an explicatum for the prescientific concept of degree of confirmation. A few months later Y. Bar-Hillel published an article attempting to show that no serious error had been committed (particularly by Carnap) and that the problem introduced by Popper was simply a "verbal one. "3 Popper replied immediately that "Dr. Bar-Hillel forces me [Popper] now to criticize Carnap's theory further," and he [Popper] introduced further objections which, if accepted, destroy Carnap's theory. 4 About eight years after this exchange took place I was in graduate school at the University of Chicago in search of a topic for a doctoral dissertation. An investigation of the issues involved in this exchange seemed to be ideal for me because I had (and still have) a great ad miration for the work of both Carnap and Popper. A thoroughly revised and I hope improved account of that investigation appears in the first five chapters of this book. Put very briefly, what I found were four main points of contention., 1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keynes, H. Reichen- bach and R. Carnap. 2 It was Popper's intention then, to expose the error and to introduce an explicatum for the prescientific concept of degree of confirmation. A few months later Y. Bar-Hillel published an article attempting to show that no serious error had been committed (particularly by Carnap) and that the problem introduced by Popper was simply a "verbal one. "3 Popper replied immediately that "Dr. Bar-Hillel forces me [Popper] now to criticize Carnap's theory further," and he [Popper] introduced further objections which, if accepted, destroy Carnap's theory. 4 About eight years after this exchange took place I was in graduate school at the University of Chicago in search of a topic for a doctoral dissertation. An investigation of the issues involved in this exchange seemed to be ideal for me because I had (and still have) a great ad- miration for the work of both Carnap and Popper. A thoroughly revised and I hope improved account of that investigation appears in the first five chapters of this book. Put very briefly, what I found were four main points of contention.
LC Classification Number
Q174-175.3
Item description from the seller
Seller business information
Seller Feedback (7,118)
- u***m (11)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseBook was shipped quickly, securely packaged, and better than the pictures. Great value for an addition to my encyclopedia. Seller responded quickly and sent over additional photos upon request. Would absolutely buy from seller again.The Works of Aristotle, Vol. 2 (Great Books of the Western World, Vol. 9) (#387030162335)
- 0***a (1428)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseLike new just as described. I really appreciate the packaging of this book prior to shipment. My book wasn’t just thrown into some plastic bag. I do appreciate that so keep it up seller. A+J. D. Vance Is a Fake Hillbilly: Think Twice Before Calling (All) Coalfield Appa (#388042689635)
- m***e (2166)- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaseWonderful set of books! Pristine. Very pleased. As advertised. Very good price. Items were wrapped and packed securely: books individually wrapped in packing paper, bubble wrap for cushion, sturdy cardboard box - great job!! Fast post. Free shipping (nice!). Worry free transaction. Thank you!Album of American History, 4 Volume Set, Colonial Period; 1738-1853; 1853-1893.. (#383587204152)