|Listed in category:
SAVE £5 FOR EVERY £50 WITH 20230103115A5C8 (Max £50 off)See all eligible items and terms
Have one to sell?

1pc Pool Cue Chalk Snooker Tip No-slip Chalk Table Billiards Chalk Accessories

ukoutstanding
  • (12376)
  • Registered as a business seller
£2.59
Condition:
New
More than 10 available / 477 sold
Breathe easy. Returns accepted.
This one's trending. 477 have already sold.
Postage:
Doesn't post to United States. See detailsfor postage
Located in: Guangzhou, China
Delivery:
Varies
Returns:
14 days return. Buyer pays for return postage. See details- for more information about returns

Shop with confidence

eBay Money Back Guarantee
Get the item you ordered or your money back. Learn moreeBay Money Back Guarantee - opens new window or tab
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:394089101769
Last updated on 24 Apr, 2024 04:02:08 BSTView all revisionsView all revisions

Item specifics

Condition
New: A brand-new, unused, unopened and undamaged item in original retail packaging (where packaging ...
Brand
Unbranded
Type
Table Accessories
MPN
Does Not Apply
Package
1PC

Item description from the seller

ukoutstanding

ukoutstanding

97.6% positive Feedback
75K items sold
Joined Aug 2020
Usually responds within 24 hours

Detailed seller ratings

Average for the last 12 months

Accurate description
4.8
Reasonable postage cost
5.0
Delivery time
4.9
Communication
4.9
Registered as a business seller

Seller Feedback (15,141)

i***c (946)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past 6 months
Verified purchase
It is more like Triangle chalk.Soft.
a***8 (778)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past 6 months
Verified purchase
Excellent item thank you
2***4 (157)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past year
Verified purchase
Package arrived in good condition so the obvious damage occurred before posting. Still usable but one of the two had clearly been dropped as no chalk fragments were in the bag. See pictures. That said this is my second purchase as although postage takes a while the chalk does work and is good value so I would still recommend it.
See all Feedback