Even the Romans recognised Arthur, they had to! Time we did too.
It has to be understood that this book, and others by the same authors, is the fruit of original research. The language is plain and simple, and straight to the point - this is how it is. And it's easy to follow. Concrete physical evidence for Arthur, in the shape of old documents, church records, monuments and relics, is overwhelming. Nothing is on trust, no other academic researcher is quoted - there is no need. Corroboration is in the form of real artifacts that speak for themselves. As Alan Wilson says, "It is harder to miss Arthur than to find him." And that short sentence says it all. Academic detractors and doubters need to go back to school. This is real history, done properly.