About
All Feedback (157)
fuq-04 (5078)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past year
Verified purchase
Good buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
infinitebargains4u (35781)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past 6 months
Verified purchase
Fast Payment, No Problems, Excellent Buyer!
tap-magician (77732)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past 6 months
Verified purchase
A much valued customer
ppeworksolutions (240425)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past 6 months
Verified purchase
Excellent EBAYER, Thank You from PPE WORK SOLUTIONS
borntogolf70 (762)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past year
Verified purchase
Hope to deal with you again. Thank you.
a2k.shop (2452)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past year
Verified purchase
Thanks for shopping with us, valued A2K customer, hope to deal with you again
Reviews (3)
02 Jan, 2020
A pale (but functional) imitation
This is cheaper clone of a far more expensive original and as such you cannot expect the same standards.
That said, my observations are as follows:
1) Not particularly breathable: a walk at pace leaves you quite sweaty, with moisture remaining in the garment (not evaporating)
2) Sleeves are on the short side - and when putting the top on, you push the fleece through the sleeve ends
3) Kangaroo pocket has fleece on one side only (body liner) - if hands are cold, they will stay that way
4) I’ve not used the hood yet, but it does bulk the collar / makes to a snug neck fit!
5) The cut is not ‘next to skin’ or to wear a thin wicking top underneath - more space than expected for thicker layers.
However, for standing watching rugby or a gentle amble with the dog, it’s perfectly serviceable- just don’t expect Buffalo or military garment-spec performance.
06 Jan, 2020
Solid piece of kit
Only received the product today but, after running through set up, it seems to be a well sorted and configured piece of equipment. Speed good so far - then again, no major software added to date.
Next purchase is SD card to boost the storage further.
27 Jul, 2020
Not fit for purpose
Product arrived with next day shipping: quality of components seems robust enough for multiple uses.
However, to extract juice from fruit you need multiple additional blocks of wood (or their equivalent) to allow appropriate compression of the fruit - as the single point of failure is the limitation of how far you can compress the fruit with the items provided (only just below the barrel lip).
I’ve tried it with chopped, ripe apples (generated very little juice) and then pulped apples (much better success rate) - however with both options, fruit escapes up the side of the wooden lid, making a mess of the wood and the additional compression blocks.
This might work better for grapes / berries - definitely not brilliant for apples.