About
All Feedback (799)
- armchairfinds (4903)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer. Thank you for your business!
- sportstorms (74047)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
- centriq (267)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, hope to deal with you again!
- nygratitudeusa (2133)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseGreat communication. A pleasure to do business with.
- *****- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseThank you for an easy, pleasant transaction. Excellent buyer. A++++++.
- endl3x75 (73)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseThank you for an easy, pleasant transaction. Excellent buyer. A++++++.
Reviews (14)
24 Jan, 2018
CCD is much better than CMOS
CCD delivers better image resolution than CMOS. I don't know what the "4 Waterproof Night Vision HD" is all about but I don't see anything when it's powered ON and I look at it using my smartphone camera. Smartphone cameras can "see" IR and other things not visible to the human eye.
03 Feb, 2012
A very cost-efficient product that functions the way it should
For about 5 years, I had a WGR614v6 that I configured as an Access Point for exclusive use with my old Wired Router/VPN setup but eventually, I upgraded everything to CISCO. The WGR614v6 didn't retire, it just went onwards to create a WLAN in a college boarding house where 4 kids (including my daughter) use it to download music, watch video, post clips, play Xbox, etc., etc. and thankfully, also occasional do internet research work to maintain their GPAs. Over the last 3 years the WGR614v6 has been in service, it gave them NO problems. So just recently when another dad asked me to set up the most cost-efficient WLAN possible in his son's college pad, choosing a WGR614v7 (or the next gen after the Version-6), was simply a no-brainer.
13 Apr, 2016
Back in the Day...
It came time to replace the pre-amp valves in my '64 Fender Bandmaster but rather than go Chinese (or fakes), I decided to give these Mullards a try. The Mullard Radio Valve Co. Ltd. of Southfields UK was a premium name back in the day when valves/vacuum tubes was still the norm for amplification. Mullard eventually shut down because the tech got eclipsed by solid-state. Someone bought Mullard's facilities, crated it to the USSR and today, that's where these "re-issues" come from. My amp now delivers fuller sound but I don't know if it's because the valves are just new, or if it's because they're Mullards (which I can only hope are genuine).