About
All Feedback (1,227)
- albh9212 (2995)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseThank you for an easy, pleasant transaction. Excellent buyer. A++++++.
- ppayhi (446)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseThank you for an easy, pleasant transaction. Excellent buyer. A++++++.
- *****- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaseGreat communication. A pleasure to do business with.
- rams_store (57437)- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaseThanks for your business with RAMS Store.... Regards
- sujhejr*gnfg (2756)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
- luckyfortune6 (5822)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
Reviews (8)
05 Feb, 2012
Look great, but the appearance is deceiving. Disappointing acoustically.
1 of 3 found this helpful This mic costs about 1/5 of the price of a Shure SM58 and looks identical to it, even internally. The model number suggests it should be a close approximation. The capsule is a very detailed copy of it's Shure predecessor.
Unfortunately that is where the similarities end. Acoustically the midrange is honky and has peaks between 400-1200hz making feedback an issue with monitors. It does not have the rich bass response or the signature bass boost proximity effect of its Shure counterpart.
I bought 4 of these new, for less than the price of one SM58, to give them a try. I presumed they might be ok for backup vocals or micing guitar amps at the worst case. I have revised my view about backup vocals, I think they are destined to be limited to using them for micing guitar amps. They may also be ok for micing brass instruments with some EQ adjustment.
I also bought some Behringer mics at about the same price. The Behringer mics, while not looking as smart as this SM58 copy, actually performed surprisingly well compared to an SM58. These mics, while looking the part, do not.
On the positive side they appear to have the ability to handle high sound pressure levels, but their midrange peaks would make them problematic with drums.
I was also disappointed with the "free" microphone cables that came with the 4 I bought. The cable had an XLR for the mic and a mono Jack on the other end. I considered changing the Jack to an XLR to rebalance the lead and discovered the lead was a single core guitar lead, not a microphone lead at all. (buyers beware)
I recommend them as a smart looking budget mic. Unfortunately they don’t cut the big league for vocals.
02 Jul, 2017
Underlying quality destroyed by design flaws
These headphones have an Automatic Gain Control {AGC) Amplifier built in. So when the sound goes soft, they ramp the volume up. Sounds reasonable you might think, even useful. But what if you are monitoring audio equipment and want to know the relative levels of things? Or things go quiet & the AGC ramps up the input sensitivity? You get an earful of noise.
Next problem is the base transmitter, which is powered by a plugpack, so no battery waste if things go quiet for a bit. No need for an automatic shutoff in quiet breaks. But it has, and when the RF transmission stops, the headphones open up to all the surrounding radio interference filling your ears with a painful level of noise & static.
Now both these annoying features should have a switch to deactivate them, nut they dont.
02 Nov, 2019
Great sound, convenient & easy to use.
Great sounds, simple & easy to use. The built in reverb effect is sensational. I also have an expensive Roland rack mount midi sound generator & bought this because of the size convenience. No loss in tonality. Got it to use with Casio MIDI Sax...