About
All Feedback (230)
- webuybooks (2524313)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseQuick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
- tujiue_92 (603)- Feedback left by buyer.Past 6 monthsVerified purchaseGreat communication. A pleasure to do business with.
- webuy_games (112859)- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaseHope to deal with you again. Thank you.
- d***o (147)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseFantastic seller A*
- rtgroup11 (633241)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchase✅ Thankyou for shopping at RTG Automotive - rtgroup11 ✅
- flower2sandi (3341)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseQuick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
Reviews (2)
20 Jun, 2018
Didn't work for me
I wanted to use it with an HP laptop that already had Bluetooth but was cutting out on the headphones. I thought perhaps a usb dongle would work properly. Unfortunately I could not get this daffodil thing to work at all and it kept giving me the Blue Screen Of Death. It might be because the laptop already had Bluetooth. Hmm
08 Jun, 2016
Misleading product specs
1 of 1 found this helpful This camera is a no-brand copy of the SJCAM SJ4000, which costs twice as much. It has slightly different software but overall seems pretty similar.
1080p video mode is OK quality, but it's 24 fps, NOT 30 fps as specified above or on the camera. You can tell by looking at the file properties in Windows, or by taking a video of the seconds changing on a clock and stepping through 1 frame at a time, counting the frames.
Even worse, 720p "60 fps" mode is only 48 fps, and it doubles-up each frame, so it's only 24 unique frames per second, not 60. So the specifications are misleading, basically a bare-faced lie to cover up the fact it's worse than a GoPro. (Note: the "genuine" SJCAM SJ4000 also apparently does frame doubling.)
Still photos are poor quality, blurry and over-sharpened, and "12 megapixel" resolution clearly just upscaled from a much lower resolution (less than 1 mpx by the look of it).
Recorded sound is also very bad, even out of the waterproof case. It makes it sound like I have a speech impediment, which I don't.
You get what you pay for. If £33 is all you can afford, then this is probably the best "action cam" you'll get for the price. But your phone probably takes better photos and video if you don't specifically need the robust / lightweight / waterproof properties of the action cam class - or you could get any other stills camera that also takes video, and quality will be much higher.
I can imagine this fills a niche of sufficiently cheap and robust to throw around on holiday or give to a child, without worrying about it getting broken. You can go even cheaper and get the non-Wifi version, if you don't want to use it with a tablet.
I might have given this a higher rating on the basis of what you are actually getting for your money, but I particularly dislike it when I am sold something on the basis of false information.