4.34.3 out of 5 stars
8 product ratings
  • 5stars

    5ratings
  • 4stars

    2ratings
  • 3stars

    0rating
  • 2stars

    0rating
  • 1star

    1rating

Would recommend100% agree

Good value100% agree

Good quality100% agree

8 reviews

by

Good Value comes with Silver Oxide cell

Very happy with this movement and speed of delivery. I used it to replace the 7N43 movement in my 25-year old old Seiko watch which had suffered water damage. It came well packed in a solid case with a stem and a branded silver-oxide battery. I will need to buy a crown separately if I want to get the 100m water resistance back as the old crown seal lets in water.Read full review...

Verified purchase:  Yes | Condition: new | Sold by: hswalsh

by

Unbelievable at the price.

My Seiko SQ100 stopped working and I was told it would cost £80 to repair. I decided that I would try and fix it myself, I know nothing of watches but being a model maker thought I might be able to tackle this with a replacement movement. Brilliant, for less than a 'fiver' and an hours work my watch is up and running again!!!!!Read full review...

Verified purchase:  Yes | Condition: new | Sold by: hswalsh

by

REPLACING U/S WATCH MOVT'S...

Great value ..both my Seiko's working fine now...fiddly replacing second hands...but i won...

Verified purchase:  Yes | Condition: new | Sold by: hswalsh

by

Good value for money

The movement was well made,easy to fit and worked perfectly

Verified purchase:  Yes | Condition: new | Sold by: hswalsh

by

perfect gift or repair

Good watch mechanism

Verified purchase:  Yes | Condition: new | Sold by: hswalsh

by

watch parts

first class service and parts

Verified purchase:  Yes | Condition: new | Sold by: hswalsh

by

VX43 seiko watch module

A very good replacement mechanism to restore a non running quartz watch easy to fit

Verified purchase:  Yes | Condition: new | Sold by: hswalsh

by

Lorus VX43-X041

Fitted into a Lorus watch and working well. Keeping perfect time.

Verified purchase:  Yes | Condition: new | Sold by: hswalsh

Why is this review inappropriate?